Bond market pricing continues to be near extremes with both historically attractive real yields and historically unattractive high yield credit spreads.

TIPS 5-Year vs High Yield Bond Spreads (July 2015 to June 2025)

It is a favorable environment for fixed income investors because you don’t have to take on a lot of credit risk to find attractive yields. We last discussed this topic in our commentary published on April 9, 2025, “Bonds: A Tale of Two Markets.”

Are active bond funds positioned for this unique set up? We believe they are, just not in the way you might think.

Below is a scatter chart of the 20 largest actively managed short-term bond funds. In the center is the largest index fund in the category.

Standard Deviation from Index: Duration & Credit Quality (AAA, AA, and A)

As of June 30, 2025

In terms of credit quality, the vast majority of the funds (14 out of 20 or 70%) have a lower credit profile than the index (their dot is below the X axis). Looking at interest rate risk, the vast majority of funds (15 out of 20 or 75%) have a lower duration than the index (their dot is to the left of the Y axis). 

This is the exact opposite of what one might expect: these funds are taking excess credit risk despite tight credit spreads and are taking less interest rate risk despite high real yields (and the prospect of the Federal Reserve cutting the Fed Funds rate according to market pricing).

Contrast this positioning with FPA New Income – it is one of only two funds in the upper right quadrant, meaning it has a higher credit profile AND higher duration than the index.

This isn’t the first time FPA New Income has been positioned differently than its peers. As of the end of 2021, when rates were near ~0%, FPA New Income had a duration of 1.39 years while the Morningstar U.S. Short-Term Bond Category peers had an average duration of 2.75 years. 

If you have any questions, please reach out to us directly through this form to dive deeper into the active management process of the FPA New Income Fund.