Dear Shareholder:

Performance Overview

Source Capital’s (“Source” or “Fund”) net asset value (NAV) gained 1.75% for the quarter and 7.78% for the trailing twelve months, which is higher than the balanced MSCI ACWI/Bloomberg US Agg index, the Fund’s primary illustrative benchmark.

Performance versus Illustrative Indices (%)1
Q1 2025Trailing 12-month
Source Capital – NAV1.757.78
60% MSCI ACWI / 40% BBG US Agg0.346.30
60% S&P 500 / 40% BBG US Agg-1.457.02

The Fund’s risk exposure is fairly balanced between Equities and Credit, as reflected in the following table.

Portfolio Exposure (%)2
Q1 2025
Equity
Common Stocks38.1
Total Equity38.1
Credit
Public20.2
Private (invested assets only)19.4
Total Credit39.5
Other Limited Partnerships4.2
Other0.0
Cash and Equivalents18.2
Total100
Portfolio Discussion3

Equity

We spoke to generally high stock valuations, particularly in the US, in the Fund’s 2024 year-end commentary. We took advantage of higher prices and reduced and sold some of our positions.

With respect to the recent performance of the Fund, in the previous twelve months, Source’s top five equity performers contributed 2.41% to its return while its bottom five detracted 1.50%.

Trailing Twelve-Month Contributors and Detractors as of March 31, 2025 (%)4
Top 5Performance
Contribution
Percent of
Portfolio
Bottom 5Performance
Contribution
Percent of
Portfolio
Holcim0.592.5Glencore-0.401.1
Kinder Morgan0.510.8Ferguson Enterprises-0.331.1
Wells Fargo0.501.5Comcast Corporation-0.312.2
Citigroup0.442.2LG-0.250.7
Howmet Aerospace0.370.5Samsung C&T-0.220.5
2.417.6-1.505.7

While we reviewed many of the above contributors and detractors in the last year, Kinder Morgan had some favorable events that we believe helped drive its stock price higher—a consensus developed that AI data centers will require a significant increase in US natural gas consumption; the new administration reversed the previous ban on LNG development; and the company materially increased its backlog of financially attractive development projects.5 In addition to these positive external developments, solid operating performance and continued exemplary corporate management contributed to strong stock performance. Other than Kinder Morgan, no significant news drove the prices of the other contributors or detractors during the trailing twelve months.6

While the Fund’s first and third quarter commentaries typically communicate performance and some of the names that drove it over the last year, even that seems less pertinent today given recent market volatility associated with the moving target of what tariffs will or won’t be. We have no idea where things will end up – our tariffs or that of our trading partners – which feeds investor’s insecurity. You have not entrusted us with your hard-earned capital to opine on public policy but rather to do the best with the hand we are dealt. The markets respond fearfully to uncertainty, but nothing is ever certain. In strong economic environments and stock markets, complacency creates false confidence, but when negative news headlines raise more questions than answers, investors often assume the worst. We never would have imagined we would have had to deal with the Great Financial Crisis, a pandemic, or a global trade war, but that is why we have always endeavored to invest with a margin of safety with a focus on preparation for the unknown rather than trying to predict the uncertain.

Fixed Income

Traditional

High yield bond spreads increased during the quarter, but from a low base, as reflected in the following chart. The spread on the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index increased by 61 bps to 374 bps, ending the quarter at the 22nd percentile. The spread on the Bloomberg US Corporate BB High Yield Index, excluding Energy, increased by 47 bps to 240 bps, ending the quarter at the 34th percentile. We often look to that BB component of the high yield index as a more consistent measure of high yield bond market pricing over time because it removes some of the distortions associated with composition changes in the overall high yield index.

Bloomberg US Corporate High-Yield BB ex. Energy Index Yield-To-Worst (YTW) and Spread7

As we evaluated investment opportunities during the quarter, narrow spreads gave us pause. Spreads were low on an absolute basis and relative to history, and the market seemed leveraged to good outcomes with little protection against bad outcomes. Particularly with tariffs on the horizon, we found these low spreads provided inadequate absolute compensation for credit risk. Due to possible tariffs, debt investments now face a broader range of outcomes with potentially greater downsides. In other words, we believe that the scope for both a widening of spreads and a permanent impairment of capital is greater due to the potential negative implications of tariffs for earnings and asset value. Because of inadequate compensation, we did not find attractive investment opportunities in Credit, aside from one investment during the quarter.

Private Credit

Source has 24.8% committed to private credit (including called and uncalled capital). We continue to look for opportunities to increase that exposure.

Corporate & Other

Distribution

On March 20, 2025, the Fund’s Board approved maintaining the current rate of 20.83 cents per share for its regular monthly distribution through May 2025.8 This equates to an annualized 6.02% unlevered distribution rate based on the Fund’s closing market price on March 31, 2025.

Discount to NAV

The Fund’s discount to NAV closed at 4.9% at quarter-end. The average discount to NAV for the trailing twelve months was 5.0%.9

Closing

We continue to monitor the companies we own and those we hope to purchase, fine-tuning models as we prepare for the worst, yet hope for the best.

Respectfully submitted,

Source Capital Portfolio Managers
May 14, 2025