Not authorized for distribution unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.

Average Annual Total Returns (%)
As of Date: 12/31/201730 Years20 Years15 Years10 Years5 Years3 Years1 YearYTDQTR
FPA New Income, Inc.6.053.903.012.211.461.782.672.670.43
BBgBarc US Agg Bond6.364.984.154.012.102.243.543.540.39
CPI + 1003.603.183.112.632.422.613.053.050.90
BBgBarc US Aggregate 1-3 YrN/A3.452.411.950.860.950.860.86-0.20

Periods greater than one year are annualized. Performance is calculated on a total return basis which includes reinvestment of all distributions. Comparison to any Index is for illustrative purposes only. The Fund does not include outperformance of any index or benchmark in its investment objectives.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. This data represents past performance and investors should understand that investment returns and principal values fluctuate, so that when you redeem your investment it may be worth more or less than its original cost. The Fund’s expense ratio as of its most recent prospectus is 0.49%. Current month-end performance data may be obtained at www.fpafunds.com or by calling toll-free, 1-800-982 4372.

Please see important disclosures at the end of the commentary.


Key Points
  • Rarely do intermediate and high-yield bonds look risky at the same time. However, it appears they are both risky today. Intermediate-term bonds are barely yielding more than short-term bonds, and “high-yield” bonds are not yielding much more than high quality bonds.
  • Valuation conditions similar to today’s have only occurred twice in the past twenty years. Subsequent to both of those instances, intermediate-term and high-yield bonds performed poorly.
  • This short paper explores why investors should be concerned about these risks and why we believe FPA New Income is well positioned to help investors navigate through them.

Fixed-income investors face potential subpar returns if they do not properly evaluate two aspects of risk: interest rate (or duration1) risk and credit risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Investors must take greater care not to underprice interest rate risk when short- and longer-term bonds have similar yields.

The following graph shows the spread in yields between the two- and ten-year Treasury bond (in blue) and what the market expects inflation to be (in green). The spread between the two- and ten-year Treasury bond is one way of measuring how worried investors are about future inflation and/or rising interest rates. Over the past twenty years, there have only been three instances when the spread has been this low: right before the 2001 and 2007-2009 recessions, and today.

Slope of Yield Curve and 10-Year Implied Inflation

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Bloomberg


The most logical reason why investors demand little or no extra yield to own longer-term bonds is if they expect a recession or another deflationary event. The problem is that deflation seems unlikely, as evidenced by the market’s growing inflation expectations.

Credit Risk

Investors must also be careful not to underprice credit risk when high-yield bonds do not have 3 compared to investment-grade debt (including Treasuries).

Today, high-yield bonds have near record low yields, both on an absolute basis and relative to Treasuries. Over the past twenty years, there has only been one other time when the yield-to-worst4 has been lower than today’s ~5.8% yield, when yields dipped below 5.3% in 2013. The high-yield market went on to post a 10%+ drawdown over the next two years, while the broader bond market was down less than 5%.

Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index


Current meager credit spreads could make sense, if, for example, leverage had come down (which should lead to fewer defaults), covenant quality had increased (which should lead to better recovery rates), or we were in the early days of the economic cycle5. But, in fact, the opposite is true on all three counts. The two charts below depict the current leverage and covenant quality levels. Investors are getting less protection and being paid worse than normal. That’s a bad deal.

Leveraged increased in Q3 to 5.0x 6

Source: Credit Suisse, the Bloomberg ProfessionalTM service

Moody’s Covenant Quality Indicator (CQI)7

Note: CQI includes all high-yield bonds, including high-yield lite. High-yield bonds lack a debt incurrence and/or restricted payments covenant and automatically receive the weakest possible CQ of 5.0.
Source: Moody’s High Yield Covenant Database

In summary, this is only the third time in the past twenty years when the yield curve has been this flat while at the same time high-yield spreads have been this tight.

Following the last two periods when interest rate and credit risk premiums were similar to those that currently exist, intermediate and high-yield bond investors were well served by reducing risk. This is evidenced by the max drawdown and three-year performance of FPA New Income versus the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate and High Yield Indices starting in 1998 and 2005:

Max Dawdown 1/1/1998-12/31/2000Return 1/1/1998-12/31/2000Max Drawdown 7/1/2005-6/30/2008Return 7/1/2005-6/30/2008
FPA New Income-2.39%5.49%-0.27%4.87%
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index-2.54%6.36%-1.81%4.09%
Bloomberg Barclays US High Yield Corporate Index-8.78%-0.53%-5.68%4.54%

Source: Morningstar Direct.

Our Positioning

In light of these conditions, we have maintained our short duration and continued to reduce credit risk in FPA New Income.

Source: FPA, Bloomberg Barclays

We have also generally avoided the unsecured corporate bonds that make up the portfolio of many other funds in favor of secured bonds which have tended to have similar, if not better, yield and credit risk profiles compared to unsecured corporate bonds.

Sector Allocation % net (12/31/17)US TreasuryCorporate BondAsset Backed
FPA New Income4.77.956.8
Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond Funds20.731.07.6
Morningstar Short-Term Bond Funds14.538.715.1

Source: FPA, Morningstar Direct


As bottom-up value investors, when our margin of safety starts to evaporate, we prefer less risky investments until bargains come our way again. It’s not a matter of if we will take on more duration or credit risk again, but merely when.

The solution to being inadequately compensated for interest rate and credit risk is straightforward: reduce exposure to these risks until you are paid to take them. Usually the trade-off to reducing risk is accepting a significantly lower yield (and total return) while waiting for better opportunities. The good news is that given the rise in short-term yields, FPA New Income continues to find attractive bonds, and its risk/reward characteristics are better when compared to both the broader and short-term bond market indices:

Characteristics (12/31/17)Yield to Worst (%)Effective Durations (yrs)YTW/Duration
FPA New Income2.951.472.01
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index2.715.980.45
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate 1-3 Year Index2.041.921.06

In closing, now is not the time for fixed income investors to be complacent.

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas H. Atteberry
Portfolio Manager

Abhijeet Patwardhan
Portfolio Manager

Ryan Leggio
Senior Product Specialist