Average Annual Total Returns (%)
As of September 30, 2025Since 12/1/15*5 Yr3 Yr1 YrYTDQTD10 Yr**
Source Capital – NAV8.1411.2116.2513.7613.544.598.60
60% MSCI ACWI / 40% BBG U.S. Agg7.717.9115.6411.4213.485.368.01
60% S&P 500 / 40% BBG U.S. Agg9.619.6216.7111.6711.435.669.99

Dear Shareholder:

Performance Overview

Source Capital’s (“Source” or “Fund”) net asset value (NAV) gained 4.59% for the quarter and 13.76% for the trailing twelve months, which is higher than the balanced MSCI ACWI/Bloomberg US Agg index, the Fund’s primary illustrative benchmark, for the trailing twelve months.

Performance versus Illustrative Indices (%)1
ReturnYield*
Q3 2025Trailing 12-month
Source Capital – NAV4.5913.765.27
60% MSCI ACWI / 40% BBG US Agg5.3611.422.69
60% S&P 500 / 40% BBG US Agg5.6611.672.41

The Fund’s risk exposure is nearly balanced between Equities and Credit, as reflected in the following table.

Portfolio Exposure (%)2
Q3 2025
Equity
Common Stocks40.6
Total Equity40.6
Credit
Public13.7
Private (invested assets only)20.6
Total Credit34.3
Other Limited Partnerships4.3
Other0.1
Cash and Equivalents20.8
Total100
Portfolio Discussion3

Equity

With respect to the recent performance of the Fund, in the previous twelve months, Source’s top five equity performers contributed 4.82% to its return while its bottom five detracted 2.03%.

Trailing Twelve-Month Top and Bottom Contributors (%) as of September 30, 20254

The following companies have notably impacted portfolio performance.⁵

Citigroup has improved its return on tangible equity (ROTE) compared to industry peers. In addition, regulatory changes in the US have increased the normal level of ROTE for US-based banks.  The combination of a low starting valuation, demonstrated operating improvement, and an improved regulatory environment have resulted in strong share-price performance over the past twelve months.

Despite anxiety about Alphabet’s future that has colored investors’ views of the company, its stock price has risen five-fold since our initial purchases from the time your current PM team assumed management of the Fund. Recent concerns include competitive threats in search, stemming from competing AI models, as well as antitrust scrutiny in the US and Europe. Additionally, there is an open question about the likely return on the billions spent on moonshot investments, among other issues. Its stock has risen 28% year-to-date and 57% since the end of Q1, when it was one of the Fund’s larger performance detractors in the trailing-twelve-month period, mainly due to a judge’s Q3 ruling that declined to force a breakup of Chrome and Android. While legal and competitive challenges persist, Alphabet continues to enhance its existing search offering with new AI features that have been well-received and are continually evolving. Meanwhile, YouTube is now the most-watched media outlet on the planet, with more than one trillion hours of video viewed, and arguably remains under monetized. We expect its cloud offering to continue to grow and eventually achieve the higher margins of its larger peers. Furthermore, the value of Waymo’s leading self-driving technology is evident to those of us at FPA who have experienced its autonomous ride-share service, and its bright future is likely not fully reflected in its stock price. The Fund therefore continues to maintain a position in Alphabet, although we have sold some shares over time.

JDE Peet’s is a pure-play coffee and tea company, with a presence in over 100 markets and a portfolio of 50+ brands. Following a period of material underperformance, JDE Peet’s changed management and agreed to be acquired by Keurig Dr. Pepper. The combination of improved management and agreement to sell the business led to strong performance over the past twelve months.

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) is a leading producer of ingredients for food, beverage, personal care, health, and household products industries. Its products are ubiquitous across many household staples, including the enzyme used in half of cold-water laundry detergents, another enzyme used in one-fifth of the global beer market, and one-third of yogurts use an IFF culture. IFF has faced challenges: its prior management was unfortunately reckless in capital allocation, making poor acquisitions and failing to manage its diverse global enterprise effectively. This transformed a high-margin, unlevered company into one with a lower margin and greater leverage. However, a new CEO has renewed the company’s focus on being best-in-class operationally, with a smaller suite of products. IFF has sold and is expected to continue to sell non-core assets, which would decrease the firm’s leverage and likely improving margins. The company has burned investors, leading many to adopt a wait-and-see attitude. IFF’s current ~$4 of free cash flow could increase to $5-6 in a few years, and if successful, its P/E ratio should also rise to be more in line with its peers. With its stock currently at $61, we don’t see much downside and, should IFF execute well, we can reasonably see a path to the stock price doubling over the next few years (inclusive of its free cash flow).6

CarMax, the largest retailer of used cars in the US, has been a disappointment. We entered 2025 with hopes that an improved omnichannel offering in an improving used vehicle market would drive increased sales volumes, market share, and profit growth. Instead, we’ve watched management make a series of missteps. The company withdrew its 2030 unit sales targets at the beginning of the year, citing tariff-related uncertainty expected to have little impact five years from now—not particularly confidence-boosting, especially when their competitors retained their stated medium-term goals. Management mistakenly expected their strong fiscal first quarter to continue. They overbought inventory at elevated prices, which they were then forced to work through in the second quarter, causing them to lose market share. Investors have punished the company for its mistakes, and shares have declined by 47% year to date. Despite our disappointment in management’s execution, the company’s share price appears inexpensive to us. CarMax trades for roughly 12x forward consensus earnings and 1.1x tangible book value. Two independent directors bought shares in early October, seemingly supporting that view. The company also increased its share repurchase program, though we wish they would have held off on repurchases until the market was aware of the current disappointing news. We still believe that CarMax has built a differentiated used vehicle retail business and could see substantial share price improvement if the company rights itself, but operational execution needs to significantly improve.

Fixed Income

Traditional

Aside from one investment during the quarter, we did not generally view Credit (investments rated BBB or lower) as attractively priced. We seek to opportunistically invest in Credit when we believe prices adequately compensate for the risk of permanent impairment of capital and near-term mark-to-market risk.

For the past several months, we have had to navigate a market with very low spreads. Indeed, the high-yield market was historically expensive. The following chart shows the yield and spread on the Bloomberg High Yield Index and the BB component of the Bloomberg High Yield Index, excluding energy. We find the latter index to be a better directional measure of high-yield prices because it removes some of the distortions caused by compositional changes in the broader index over time.

Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High-Yield and BB ex. Energy Index Yield-To-Worst (YTW) and Spread7

At 297 bps, spreads on the High Yield Index ended the quarter at the third percentile, while the BB component shown above ended the quarter at 192 bps or the fifth percentile.

Low spreads expose investors to the risk of uncompensated losses from credit-related impairments. Low spreads also introduce greater exposure to mark-to-market losses if and when bonds reprice to wider spreads because of idiosyncratic issues or exogenous events. We don’t know what that exogenous event might be – perhaps a recession, war, lurching government policy, credit contagion, fear of endemic fraud, or a pandemic, just to name a few possibilities. What we do know is that, historically, markets priced on the assumption of perfection tend not to do well when reality ends up being imperfect.

Further, the excess return that one can expect when buying debt at low spreads is unappealing in our view. The chart below shows the forward one-year return on the Bloomberg High Yield Index in excess of the return on similar-duration Treasuries versus the spread on that high-yield index at the start of each year. Historically, the average excess return has been negative when the starting spread is less than 300 bps. As noted above, the spread on the Bloomberg High Yield Index ended the quarter at 297 bps.

High Yield Spread vs. Forward Excess Return8

Private Credit

Source has 25.6% committed to private credit (including called and uncalled capital) as of quarter-end. We continue to look for opportunities to increase that exposure.

Corporate & Other

Distribution

On August 22, 2025, the Fund’s Board approved maintaining the current rate of 20.83 cents per share for its regular monthly distribution through August 2025.9 This equates to an annualized unlevered distribution rate of 5.55% based on the Fund’s closing market price on September 30, 2025.

Discount to NAV

The Fund’s discount to NAV closed at 5.04% at quarter-end. The average discount to NAV for the trailing twelve months was 4.84%.10

Closing

While the world changes around us and investors’ interpretations of those shifts swing markets, we maintain a continuity that has been our hallmark for more than a decade. As Robert Plant sang, “The Song Remains the Same.” Day in and day out, our research team seeks to improve our understanding of the best global businesses while selectively conducting work on more episodic commercial opportunities. We look forward to sharing a more detailed view of our portfolio positioning and the factors that influence it in our year-end commentary. Until then.

Respectfully submitted,
Source Capital Portfolio Managers
November 7, 2025